CLOSED LOOP INTERVAL ONTOLOGY
       The Digital Integration of Conceptual Form
TzimTzum/Kaballah | Loop definition | Home | ORIGIN    
Please sign in
or register

Email *

Password *

Home | About

Select display
Show public menu
Show all theme groups
Show all themes
Show all terms
Order results by
Alphabetical
Most recently edited
Progress level
Placeholder
Note
Sketch
Draft
Polished


Searches selected display

The Many Forms of Many/One
Universal conceptual form

Invocation
Aligning the vision

Project under development
Evolving and coalescing

Guiding motivation
Why we do this

A comprehensive vision
Ethics / governance / science

Cybernetic democracy
Homeostatic governance

Collective discernment
Idealized democracy

Objectives and strategy
Reconciliation and integration

Reconciliation of perspectives
Holistic view on alternatives

What is a concept?
Definitions and alternatives

Theories of concepts
Compare alternatives

What is truth?
How do we know?

Semantics
How meaning is created

Synthetic dimensionality
Foundational recursive definition

Universal hierarchy
Spectrum of levels

A universal foundation
The closed loop ensemble contains
all primary definitions

Set
Dimensions of set theory

Numbers
What is a number?

Venn diagrams
Topology of sets

Objects in Boolean algebra
How are they constructed?

Core vocabulary
Primary terms

Core terms on the strip
Closed Loop framework

Graphics
Hierarchical models

Digital geometry
Euclid in digital space

The dimensional construction
of abstract objects
Foundational method

The digital integration
of conceptual form
Compositional semantics

Closed loop interval ontology
How it works

Cognitive science
The integrated science of mind

Equality
What does it mean?

Formal systematic definitions
Core terms

Data structures
Constructive elements
and building blocks

Compactification
Preserving data under transformation

Steady-state cosmology
In the beginning

Semantic ontology
Domain and universal

Foundational ontology
A design proposal

Coordinate systems
Mapping the grid

Articles
From other sources

Arithmetic
Foundational computation

Plato's republic and
homeostatic democracy
Perfecting political balance

Branching computational architecture
Simultaneity or sequence

Abstract math and HTML
Concrete symbolic representation

All knowledge as conceptual
Science, philosophy and math
are defined in concepts

Does the Closed Loop
have an origin?
Emerging from a point


Synthetic dimensionality

We are exploring a universal definition and constructive method for semantic objects, based on the principle of dimensionality.

"Synthetic dimensionality" was originally defined in the early 1990's. We are beginning to gather up facets of its definition and properties and combine them in this context.

As the original vision for Synthetic Dimensionality project appeared, the claim and hypothesis emerged that "everything (all abstract objects and concepts) can be built out of synthetic dimension." This involved two major claims:

1) Every facet of conceptual structure and definition can be defined as composed from (constructed from) synthetic dimensions.

2) It Is highly desirable to do this, for many reasons

"Everything is built out of dimensions, and dimensions are built out of dimensions"

"A dimension is a facet of something"

Synthetic dimensions were seen as the universal constructive element, the universal conceptual building block, from which all mathematical and semantic objects could and should be constructed. It is the foundational concept for the universalization of language, and the interconnection of all languages. Since all languages are built from the same underling elements, and driven by the same principles and motivations -- "any language can be translated into any other language"