Closed Loop Interval Ontology
       The Digital Integration of Conceptual Form
TzimTzum/Kaballah | Loop definition | Home | ORIGIN    
Please sign in
or register

Email *

Password *

Home | About

Select display
Show public menu
Show all theme groups
Show all themes
Show all terms
Order results by
Most recently edited
Progress level

Searches selected display

The Many Forms of Many/One
Universal conceptual form

Aligning the vision

Project under development
Evolving and coalescing

Guiding motivation
Why we do this

A comprehensive vision
Ethics / governance / science

Cybernetic democracy
Homeostatic governance

Collective discernment
Idealized democracy

Objectives and strategy
Reconciliation and integration

Reconciliation of perspectives
Holistic view on alternatives

What is a concept?
Definitions and alternatives

Theories of concepts
Compare alternatives

What is truth?
How do we know?

How meaning is created

Synthetic dimensionality
Foundational recursive definition

Universal hierarchy
Spectrum of levels

A universal foundation
The closed loop ensemble contains
all primary definitions

Dimensions of set theory

What is a number?

Venn diagrams
Topology of sets

Objects in Boolean algebra
How are they constructed?

Core vocabulary
Primary terms

Core terms on the strip
Closed Loop framework

Hierarchical models

Digital geometry
Euclid in digital space

The dimensional construction
of abstract objects
Foundational method

The digital integration
of conceptual form
Compositional semantics

Closed loop interval ontology
How it works

Cognitive science
The integrated science of mind

What does it mean?

Formal systematic definitions
Core terms

Data structures
Constructive elements
and building blocks

Preserving data under transformation

Steady-state cosmology
In the beginning

Semantic ontology
Domain and universal

Foundational ontology
A design proposal

Coordinate systems
Mapping the grid

From other sources

Foundational computation

Plato's republic and
homeostatic democracy
Perfecting political balance

Branching computational architecture
Simultaneity or sequence

Abstract math and HTML
Concrete symbolic representation

All knowledge as conceptual
Science, philosophy and math
are defined in concepts

Does the Closed Loop
have an origin?
Emerging from a point

X is a type of Y
A common construction protocol

This is considered to be a basic problem in the definition of categories and the creation of taxonomies.

We are looking for a way to generalize this issue, such that we define the semantic construction of X and Y according to a common dimensional protocol. Both abstract objects are defined in the same way, and in a way that is consistent with a broadly-conceived modelling and mapping method that we suppose can/should be applied to all instances of description and representation.

What is the dimensional structure of Y? How is Y defined?

What is the dimensional structure of X? How is X defined?

Y must be defined in such a way that it is capable of supporting "types".

[What is the relationship between "type" and "sub-set"? "Dogs are a type of animal" -- "Dogs are a sub-set of animals" -- "Dogs are a species of animals"]. "Sub-set, species, kind" are examples of type.

We have no general or commonly-accepted definition of "type". Type is generally a stipulated term with meaning created within a special-case/special-purpose system.

What we are exploring is a way to develop a "best descriptive method" approach that can optimize the choice of how "type" is defined. That "best method", we suppose, is inherently holistic, in that it endeavors to "include all factors at the same time", and not simply develop a strictly local protocol that seems to work for a few variables that happen to be locally adjacent.

  1. kind
  2. sort
  3. variety
  4. class
  5. category
  6. classification
  7. group
  8. set,
  9. bracket
  10. genre
  11. genus
  12. species
  13. family
  14. order
  15. breed
  16. race
  17. strain
  18. style
  19. description
  20. designation
  21. condition
  22. quality
  23. nature
  24. manner
  25. design
  26. shape
  27. form
  28. pattern
  29. rank
  30. brand
  31. make
  32. model
  33. line
  34. mark
  35. generation
  36. vintage
  37. stamp
  38. ilk
  39. kidney
  40. cast
  41. grain
  42. mold
  43. stripe

A common dimensional protocol for all description and representation
Placeholder | Back

We want a single contructive method capable of representating all abstract objects of interest, including

  • Ideal abstract representation as an object, consistent with intuition
  • Representation in a format that is consistent with symbolic/abstract manipulation (arithmetic, algebraic)
  • All the basic terms in our epistemological language

Thu, May 6, 2021

X is a type of Y
Synthetic dimensionality