Closed Loop Interval Ontology
       The Digital Integration of Conceptual Form


Please sign in
or register

Email *

Password *

Home | About

Select display
Show public menu
Show all theme groups
Show all themes
Show all terms
Order results by
Most recently edited
Progress level

Searches selected display

Aligning the vision

Project under development
Evolving and coalescing

Guiding motivation
Why we do this

A comprehensive vision
Ethics / governance / science

Cybernetic democracy
Homeostatic governance

Collective discernment
Idealized democracy

Objectives and strategy
Reconciliation and integration

Reconciliation of perspectives
Holistic view on alternatives

What is a concept?
Definitions and alternatives

Theories of concepts
Compare alternatives

What is truth?
How do we know?

How meaning is created

Synthetic dimensionality
Foundational recursive definition

Universal hierarchy
Spectrum of levels

A universal foundation
The closed loop ensemble contains
all primary definitions

Dimensions of set theory

What is a number?

Venn diagrams
Topology of sets

Objects in Boolean algebra
How are they constructed?

Core vocabulary
Primary terms

Core terms on the strip
Closed Loop framework

Hierarchical models

Digital geometry
Euclid in digital space

The dimensional construction
of abstract objects
Foundational method

The digital integration
of conceptual form
Compositional semantics

Closed loop interval ontology
How it works

Cognitive science
The integrated science of mind

What does it mean?

Formal systematic definitions
Core terms

Data structures
Constructive elements
and building blocks

Preserving data under transformation

Steady-state cosmology
In the beginning

Semantic ontology
Domain and universal

Foundational ontology
A design proposal

Coordinate systems
Mapping the grid

From other sources

Foundational computation

Steady-state cosmology
In the beginning

We are guessing that the Closed Loop is a plausible and likely interpretation of ancient cosmological visions and some modern cosmology and theology.

Given time, we can document this thesis in high detail. We believe this model has ancient historical roots and might have significant implications for modern science and culture.

This graphic is from an exploratory and speculative Russian site, and uses several graphic metaphors we employ here.

  • Uroboros - serpent swallowing its tail - perhaps an ancient intuitive metaphor for closed loop or Mobius strip
  • Color spectrum and matrix
  • Yin/Yang
  • Infinity
  • Reconciliation or interpretation of various philosophical perspectives
  • Reality or consciousness is a mental construct

Closed Loop on physics and cosmology
Placeholder | Back

There are physics and math books out there about the derivation of the universe from nothing. These may be related to the Closed Loop model.

The philosophy in a nutsell, to be revisted in detail later as time permits -- is that hysics and math are essentially defined in "concepts" -- and the math and physics are built as interpretations of those concepts.

So -- regarding a "theory of everything" -- we make the claim (explore the claim) that a theory of concepts is prior to a theory of everything based on science and math

Concepts predate physics and math for a good reason

Physics and math are based on concepts

And -- we claim -- all concepts are built on -- can be explained by -- are contained within -- the closed loop.

And this range of inclusion includes all the basic concepts of math as well as all the constructive elements of concepts (language, vocabulary, ideas, words)

Tue, May 18, 2021

Theory of everything
Placeholder | Back

We propose that the strongest and most reasonable way to develop a "theory of everything" should not begin by "uniting the strong and the weak force" -- but by developing a perfect algrebric theory of concepts, since al understanding and science is based on the underlying concepts that are interpreted by the math -- such as "steady state universe" or "the big bang".

Tue, May 18, 2021

Everything derived from the continuum
Steady-state cosmology

Mathematics is conceptual before it is computational
Sketch | Back

This is a major theme we are considering. Mathematics generally involves assigning precise definitions and measurement to ideas that are initially framed in conceptual terms.

So, we might make the argument that "the closed loop defines the universe as a concept" because it contains every facet of the universe within it, but this implies no limitation on whether reality can extend in any particular direction indefinitely or infinitely.

The concept is a sealed unit. This model and framework becomes a theory of "everything from nothing". It has existed forever, as a sealed closed absolutely stable non-transforming unit, containing everything that exists, everything that is knowable, every possible measurement. We might propose this idea as a model of "The Mind of God" -- and consider various ways that this model meets ancient/traditional standard on "what God is" -- the "properties and aspects of God"

Tue, May 18, 2021

In cosmology, the steady-state model is an alternative to the Big Bang theory of evolution of the universe. In the steady-state model, the density of matter in the expanding universe remains unchanged due to a continuous creation of matter, thus adhering to the perfect cosmological principle, a principle that asserts that the observable universe is practically the same at any time and any place.

While the steady-state model enjoyed some minority support in the scientific mainstream until the mid-20th century, it is now rejected by the vast majority of cosmologists, astrophysicists and astronomers, as the observational evidence points to a hot Big Bang cosmology with a finite age of the universe, which the steady-state model does not predict.[1][2]

Contents 1 History 2 Observational tests 2.1 Counts of radio sources 2.2 Cosmic microwave background 3 Quasi-steady state 4 Notes and citations 5 Further reading History In the 13th century, Siger of Brabant authored the thesis The Eternity of the World, which argued that there was no first man, and no first specimen of any particular: the physical universe is thus without any first beginning, and therefore eternal. Siger's views were condemned by the pope in 1277.

Cosmological expansion was originally discovered through observations by Edwin Hubble. Theoretical calculations also showed that the static universe as modeled by Einstein (1917) was unstable. The modern Big Bang theory is one in which the universe has a finite age and has evolved over time through cooling, expansion, and the formation of structures through gravitational collapse.

The steady-state model asserts that although the universe is expanding, it nevertheless does not change its appearance over time (the perfect cosmological principle); the universe has no beginning and no end. This required that matter be continually created in order to keep the universe's density from decreasing. Influential papers on steady-state cosmologies were published by Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle in 1948.[3][4] Similar models had been proposed earlier by William Duncan MacMillan, among others.[5]

It is now known that Albert Einstein considered a steady-state model of the expanding universe, as indicated in a 1931 manuscript, many years before Hoyle, Bondi and Gold. However, he quickly abandoned the idea.[6]

Observational tests Counts of radio sources See also: Source counts Problems with the steady-state model began to emerge in the 1950s and 60s, when observations began to support the idea that the universe was in fact changing: bright radio sources (quasars and radio galaxies) were found only at large distances (therefore could have existed only in the distant past), not in closer galaxies. Whereas the Big Bang theory predicted as much, the steady-state model predicted that such objects would be found throughout the universe, including close to our own galaxy. By 1961, statistical tests based on radio-source surveys[7] had ruled out the steady-state model in the minds of most cosmologists, although some proponents of the steady state insisted that the radio data were suspect.

Cosmic microwave background For most cosmologists, the definitive refutation of the steady-state model came with the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation in 1964, which was predicted by the Big Bang theory. The steady-state model explained microwave background radiation as the result of light from ancient stars that has been scattered by galactic dust. However, the cosmic microwave background level is very even in all directions, making it difficult to explain how it could be generated by numerous point sources, and the microwave background radiation shows no evidence of characteristics such as polarization that are normally associated with scattering. Furthermore, its spectrum is so close to that of an ideal black body that it could hardly be formed by the superposition of contributions from a multitude of dust clumps at different temperatures as well as at different redshifts. Steven Weinberg wrote in 1972,

The steady state model does not appear to agree with the observed dL versus z relation or with source counts ... In a sense, this disagreement is a credit to the model; alone among all cosmologies, the steady state model makes such definite predictions that it can be disproved even with the limited observational evidence at our disposal. The steady state model is so attractive that many of its adherents still retain hope that the evidence against it will eventually disappear as observations improve. However, if the cosmic microwave radiation ... is really black-body radiation, it will be difficult to doubt that the universe has evolved from a hotter denser early stage.[8] Since this discovery, the Big Bang theory has been considered to provide the best explanation of the origin of the universe. In most astrophysical publications, the Big Bang is implicitly accepted and is used as the basis of more complete theories.

Quasi-steady state

Quasi-steady-state cosmology (QSS) was proposed in 1993 by Fred Hoyle, Geoffrey Burbidge, and Jayant V. Narlikar as a new incarnation of the steady-state ideas meant to explain additional features unaccounted for in the initial proposal. The model suggests pockets of creation occurring over time within the universe, sometimes referred to as minibangs, mini-creation events, or little bangs.[9] After the observation of an accelerating universe, further modifications of the model were made.[10]

Astrophysicist and cosmologist Ned Wright has pointed out flaws in the model.[11] These first comments were soon rebutted by the proponents.[12] Wright and other mainstream cosmologists reviewing QSS have pointed out new flaws and discrepancies with observations left unexplained by proponents.[13]